Music Markup

Sometimes they get it proper, sometimes they get it unsuitable. But one thing is for certain: With regards to media reporting of severe weather events, the threat of a hurricane, tornado or even a heck of loads of snow is just not more likely to go unnoticed for lack of coverage. And with good motive. In the 24 hours leading up to Hurricane Sandy’s devastating blast via New York and New Jersey, the Weather Channel introduced in more than 2.035 million viewers, not to say a record 300 million page views on its Web site. Howard Kurtz mentioned of the Sandy protection. In the scores game, whether or not a storm actually lives up to the hype is generally an afterthought. Ratings indeed: The Weather Channel’s 2.77 million viewers on the Saturday the storm was scheduled to hit land outpaced the numbers for Sandy, a way more brutal storm. In Katrina’s aftermath, politicians and metropolis and state officials are only too wanting to observe the freakout drumbeat.


After seeing what a failure to correctly reply to a weather menace did for the likes of George W. Bush, New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin, and former FEMA chief Michael Brown (“Heckuva job, Brownie!”) local leaders most likely figure it’s better to go all in. But a couple of swings and misses by the hype machine might lull amateur storm watchers right into a false sense of security. Does severe weather hype trigger folks to under-react when a storm’s a brewing? Read on to seek out out. But it isn’t simply the sheer quantity of protection of extreme weather that feeds the hype machine. There’s additionally something about the way by which these events are lined. It’s a basic precept of journalism that pace shouldn’t be traded for accuracy. Yet plainly some of essentially the most intrepid of reporters are at instances swept up in the fury of large weather. For instance, take the widely reported, yet completely false rumor that throughout the top of Sandy’s onslaught on Manhattan, the ground of the brand new York Stock Exchange was flooded with up to three feet (1 meter) of water.

That’s not to say the way through which potential weather occasions are described. Reporters, government officials and specialists who use terms like “catastrophic,” “historic,” and “unprecedented” to explain a storm with out explaining just what makes a specific weather system distinctive do nothing but water down the gravity of these words. But it isn’t just hype that leads folks to underestimate severe weather. There are other the explanation why some of us assume that all studies of oncoming storms are simply crying wolf. As Hurricane Katrina approached the Gulf Coast in August 2005, reporters swarmed to New Orleans, and Mississippi while officials warned residents of low-mendacity areas to run for it. Yet many chose experience out the storm. Yet the Sandy expertise — with many residents of the hardest-hit areas additionally choosing to wait out the storm in spite of “necessary” evacuation calls — is a testomony to the truth that no less than some people might never believe the hype related to severe weather. The primary is named “unrealistic optimism,” which, as its handle suggests, refers to a brilliant glass half-full mentality.

Some folks just don’t assume something critically unhealthy can happen to them. Where the hype comes in is by inflicting what known as “availability bias.” In different words, a person contemplating the risks of a sure occasion — an oncoming storm, maybe — could compare it to past comparable events. After a handful of overhyped weather patterns, individuals in the danger zones of an oncoming storm could start to assume that the Weather Channel is promoting wolf tickets, so to speak. Whether it is the next Irene or another Sandy, hype is not the one cause why some people may underestimate the next superstorm, but it surely actually does not assist. In case the final three pages haven’t convinced you of the position of hype in severe weather preparation, maybe this private anecdote will do the trick. As a Brooklyner making ready for Irene to touch down in the large Apple final 12 months, like most of my neighbors, I type of freaked out somewhat bit.

It was onerous not to, not simply because of the non-stop news protection but also because of the boarded up storefronts and bodegas with lengthy traces and handwritten indicators like “out of water” and “no more flashlights.” So I stocked up on water, food, D batteries and, after all, beer. Meanwhile, my roommate mocked the panic and ordered two large pizzas. Then it occurred. And by “it” I imply “nothing.” When Sandy got here knocking more than a 12 months later, I had relocated to Washington D.C. This time round, I saved strolling past the groceries and convenience shops and as a substitute ordered a large pie. What’s it Like in the attention of a Tornado? Ablow, Keith. “Why do not people evacuate when Sandy or another main storm looms? Are they nuts?” Fox News. Jolis, Anne. “The Weather is not Getting Weirder.” The Wall Street Journal. Hiaasen, Carl. “On The Beach, Waiting For Frances.” (Nov. 18, 2012). Florida Sunshine Coast. Keene, Allison. “Hurricane Sandy Tv: CNN’s Hysteria, Weather Channel Cool, Al Roker Flaps within the Wind.” The Hollywood Reporter. Kurtz, Howard. “A Hurricane of Hype.” The Daily Beast. Kurtz, Howard. “Sandy, the Rare Storm that Lived Up to Media Hype.” CNN. Leslie, Kate. “Sandy provides Weather Channel an opportunity to Shine.” Palm Beach Post. Richwine, Lisa. “Weather Channel Leads Cable News Ratings with Hurricane Sandy Coverage.” Huffington Post. Rosenthal, Sandy. “Insistent Appeals to Evacuate Did not Warn That the Levees Could Break.” The Huffington Post. Sazalai, Georg. “Hurricane Sandy Brings Weather Channel Third-Highest Average Viewership Ever.” The Hollywood Reporter. Sunstein, Cass. “Worst-Case Scenarios: The issue of Neglect.” The new Republic. Wemple, Erik. “Hurricane Sandy: Five Tips for Avoiding Hype.” The Washington Post.